Hello AARC friends,
I just returned from a national meeting in which I worked as a clinical consultant in a vendors booth. I was totally amazed at how many RC departments did not analyze and report their own blood gases. These departments allowed the Med Techs to perform the analytical and post analytical parts of the blood gas process intervention while the RCP's performed the pre analytical component. The RCP's did not know the results in a timely manner and waited on results to be sent by the lab to the unit and in many cases the RCP's were not notified. In other hospitals, the RCP's performed the pre analytical AND analytical process interventions and the Med Techs would then perform the post analytical process intervention in line with their other lab reports pending. In almost all these cases, the lab had the analyzer physically located in the lab. Many RCP's did not know the full range of analytes that they were able to report or what brand of blood gas analyzer they were using. Very few RCP's knew about lactate and SvO2 anayte reporting with sepsis protocols. The departments that had the blood gas analyzers under their control were as a whole more well versed in all aspects of blood gas operations and how this affected their departmental productivity.
What are your thoughts on this split approach to blood gas operations? Are there any studies or best practice data to support one way or another? This Blog will certainly generate some responses and I look forward to your thoughts. The intent of this blog is to generate discussion about patient outcomes and best practice so please accept my blog for this professional reason.